Skip to Main Content

California's Proposition 8 in Federal Court

Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012)

06.05.2012 9th Circuit’s Denial of Petition for Rehearing En Banc
03.02.2012 Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee City and County of San Francisco's Corrected Response to Petition for Rehearing En Banc
02.21.2012 Petition for Rehearing En Banc by Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants Hollingsworth, Knight, Gutierrez, Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com (10-16696 and 11-16577)
02.07.2012 Perry v. Brown, Nos. 10-16696, 11-16577 (opinion regarding the constitutionality of Proposition 8 and the denial of a motion to vacate the lower court judgment in the case) - 128 pages
02.07.2012 Perry v. Brown, Nos. 10-16696, 11-16577 (Case Summary - 3 pages)
12.02.2011 Supplemental Brief of Appellees Kristen Perry, et al (10-16696)
12.02.2011 Supplemental Brief of Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee City and County of San Francisco (10-16696)
12.02.2011 Supplemental Brief of Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants Dennis Hollingsworth, et al (10-16696)
11.21.2011 Order Consolidating Cases (10-16696, 11-16577)
11.18.2011 Reply brief by Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants Hollingsworth, Knight, Gutierrez, Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com (11-16577)
11.18.2011 Motion to Consolidate Nos. 10-16696 and 11-16577
11.17.2011 Opinion by California Supreme Court on Intervenors’ Standing (Question Certified by 9th Circuit) (10-16696)
11.01.2011 Answering Brief by Appellees Kristin M. Perry and City and County of San Francisco (11-16577)
10.03.2011 Appellants' (Defendant-Intervenors) Opening Brief (11-16577)
01.04.2011 Order Certifying Standing Question to California Supreme Court
11.02.2010 Reply Brief of Defendant-Intervenors (10-16696)
10.25.2010 Answering Brief by Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo (10-16696)
10.18.2010 Answering Brief by City and County of San Francisco (10-16696)
09.22.2010 Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants' Opening Brief (10-16696)