Skip to Main Content

California's Proposition 8 in Federal Court

Perry v. Schwarzenegger, No. 09-2292, 790 F. Supp. 2d 1119 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (defendant-intervenors’ motion seeking that judgment be vacated)

06.14.2011 Order Denying Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment
05.23.2011 Reply (re Motion to Vacate Judgment) filed by Martin F. Gutierrez, Dennis Hollingsworth, Mark A. Jansson, Gail J. Knight, ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal
05.13.2011 Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion to Vacate Judgment filed by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
05.12.2011 Response (re Motion to Vacate Judgment) filed by Edmund G. Brown, Jr, Linette Scott, Kamala D. Harris, Howard Backer
05.12.2011 Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco’s Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment
04.25.2011 Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion to Vacate Judgment